Company Name
Participant Name:
Henry
Employee No:
Trainer Name:
Course Title:
AI TRAINING
Department:
{Department}
Course Date(s):
October 16, 2025
~
January 15, 2026
(A) COURSE CONTENT
1. The training objectives were clearly defined and met.
2. The training duration was reasonable.
3. The training materials (e.g. slides, handouts) were helpful and well-organized.
4. The training content was relevant to my work/role.
5. All relevant topics were covered during the training and well-understood.
6. Overall, I am satisfied with the training.
(B) TRAINER'S PRESENTATION
1. The trainer demonstrated strong knowledge of the subject matter.
2. The trainer effectively engaged participants and encourage participation.
3. The trainer's explanations were clear and easy to understand.
4. The trainer provided real examples or practical applications of the content.
5. The trainer kept the lesson lively and made me feel free to ask questions.
(C) TRAINING LOGISTICS
1. I was satisfied with the training facilities (e.g. venue, equipment, food, etc.)
2. There were no significant logistical issues or challenges during the training.
(D) OTHER COMMENTS/SUGGESTION
Training Evaluation
Improvement in Work Performance:
A
Improvement in Skill & Knowledge:
A
Others Comments:
No training required
Name of Evaluator:
GAN SOON WUAN
Evaluation Date:
December 22, 2025 at 8:57:39 PM
Sign:
Training Evaluation
Improvement in Work Performance:
Improvement in Skill & Knowledge:
Other Comments:
Recommendation:
RATING CRITERIA
The PIC/HOD shall rate based on the following criteria to review the effectiveness of the training event attended.
​
LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT
A - Good
B - Above Average
C - Average
D - Below Average
Trainee has obtained the knowledge/ information for future improvement.
Trainee has achieved the objectives.
Trainee needs further practise to gain from lesson learnt
Trainee only captured the general information.